• Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Links
    • Drilling and Fracking
    • Resources
    • Stuff I Like
    • TX Progressive Alliance
  • Must See Videos
  • PSYOPS
  • Shale Survival
    • Before drilling starts
    • Tools
    • Medical
  • FAQ
  • Contact Me

Texas Sharon's Bluedaze

Fracking News

Sadly injection is best option for fracking waste

April 23, 2015 By TXsharon

fracking waste

Fracking waste has to go somewhere and the shale boom is creating massive amounts of fracking waste. I know you are tired of all the frackquakes caused by injecting fracking waste. Injection has activated dormant faults causing earthquakes in eight states and Texas is one of the lucky states experiencing induced earthquakes.

I know you won’t like it but this is the reality so please don’t shoot the messenger.

Injection is best option for fracking waste.

Currently there are no good options for dealing with fracking waste other than not creating it in the first place. The shale boom creates about 100 times the waste conventional drilling created. The API says each foot of drilling creates about 1.2 BARRELS of waste. (That’s each foot drilled to depth plus each foot drilled horizontally.) You can do the math on that because it gives me heart palpitations.

All this fracking waste has to go someplace. But where?

Here are some options for dealing with fracking waste. Let me know which option works best for your neighborhood.

Impoundment pits are an option industry favors. They can store the fluids in these pits and reuse it on other frack jobs. But they can only reuse the fluid a couple of times. After that it will remain in the pit until it evaporates or they will injection it into a disposal well.

Impoundment pits have not worked out too well. The volatile organic compounds off-gas into the air making the neighbors sick and degrading air quality. They also leak and contaminate groundwater.

impoundment

Or you might like this kind of impoundment pit better.

WasteWater_reuse

How about one of these nice recycling centers?

frack-recycle

One community is learning the hard way about the realities of recycling fracking waste.

Luzerne County is about to be hit AGAIN by the negative effects of the natural gas industry.

An application for a permit for a Frack Water Treatment Plant has been submitted to the County for Meeker Outlet Road (the old Harveys Lake Gun Club property), in Lake Township. As a result, three or important and irreplaceable water sources will be at risk.

Frack water is known to contain toxic, carcinogenic chemicals, and the application specifies that there will be 30 or more 20,000 gallon storage tanks installed at the site, as well as radioactive contaminant testing areas. In addition, anticipate a future with non-stop frack water trucks traveling 24/7, back and forth over our back roads.

Here’s another kind of recycle center.

Fountain_Quail_stacks_image_186 This is the Fountain Quail recycling center. But I’m not sure they are still operating. Recycling is more expensive for operators so they won’t do this unless it is mandated. With low prices and a corrupt legislature, this is not a viable option right now.

A friend who toured a Fountain Quail facility said there were horrible emissions and spill and leaks everywhere.

15427_PortDesalLast but not least are the portable desal units. I think these would be the best option.

None of the above matters at this point because the Texas Railroad Commission has no intention of doing away with injection wells. I just wanted you to know that there are no good options for handling the fracking waste other that not creating it.

UPDATE: Creative options for fracking waste:

Fracking our food.

21 million gallons of oil field wastewater is sold DAILY to farmers to irrigate food crops in Kern County California.

Until now, government authorities have only required limited testing of recycled irrigation water, checking for naturally occurring toxins such as salts and arsenic, using decades-old monitoring standards. They haven’t screened for the range of chemicals used in modern oil production. LA Times

I took a FLIR video of wastewater pits when I was in Kern County. I had to wear a respirator. This is what they are putting on our food.

Don’t eat fish with tumors.

A smallmouth bass was caught in the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania that had a huge cancerous tumor on its mouth. See a video on CNN.

What else has been in the Susquehanna River?

  • Drilling waste that XTO Energy a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil spilled there.
  • Drilling waste intentionally discharged.
  • Fish with abnormal black splotches.
  • Runoff from drilling waste.

From the Department of DUH:

…people should avoid eating “fish that have visible signs of sores and lesions.” CNN

About Sharon Wilson

Sharon Wilson is considered a leading citizen expert on the impacts of shale oil and gas extraction. She is the go-to person whether it’s top EPA officials from D.C., national and international news networks, or residents facing the shock of eminent domain and the devastating environmental effects of natural gas development in their backyards.

  • Mail
  • |
  • Web
  • |
  • More Posts(5116)

Filed Under: earthquakes, injection well

Comments

  1. SharonKnowsMe says

    April 25, 2015 at 7:19 am

    Just read this, at first I thought I was on The Onion:

    http://www.star-telegram.com/news/business/barnett-shale/article19437057.html

    Cracking up at the two oil company quotes, how they’re looking forward to questioning the “methods” behind this.

    I know the TRC will ultimately do nothing, but I’m still glad to see there will be a hearing. The more education, the better. I hope.

    • TXsharon says

      April 25, 2015 at 8:02 am

      I wonder if the public will get a chance to speak or if it will be Kabuki theater with the RRC and operators.
      TXsharon recently posted..Sadly injection is best option for fracking wasteMy Profile

  2. Kim Feil says

    May 6, 2015 at 8:22 am

    BINGO “..other than not creating it”….the 1987 GAO document, that once was confidential, spoke of ground water contamination from injection wells whose contents communicated with nearby failed casings of other wells…now add the seismic activity from injections wells further risking ALL casings and a defacto ban of injection wells is important if not just because of the sheer build out of all the injection wells that risk eventual mass ground water contamination.

    https://barnettshalehell.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/injection-wells-are-known-conduits-to-ground-water-contamination-gao-confidential-doc/

  3. Kim Feil says

    May 6, 2015 at 9:18 am

    Also there was a pilot program to pipe in (instead of trucking it in) the waste waters to the Ft Worth Arc Park Compression Station and evaporate it using the waste heat (without scrubbers of course) using the EVERAS systems ..https://barnettshalehell.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/using-waste-heat-to-recycle-fracking-waste-water-2-pitfalls/ but I was told by Ft Worth officials that Chesapeake said that was too expensive for them to do this…(even without the scrubbers).

Stalk TXsharon

Recent Posts

  • Register for the worldwide premier of Uncovering the Permian Climate Bomb
  • Update: Chris Faulkner > IT Guy > Frack Master > Felon
  • French Energy Giant Total Declares War on Texas Toddlers
  • Hydrocarbon odors during oil and gas drilling
  • MSNBC and TXsharon in the Texas fracking zone
  • Blowout: Inside America’s Energy Gamble

Like Earthworks on Facebook

Categories

Archives

All work © Sharon Wilson. No works may be shared copied in full without permission. Bluedaze: Drilling Reform. Site Design by Sumy Designs. Powered by those who advocate for a safe and healthy environment.